This is one of the areas where we are on our own with the other bodies (BMAA, LAA, BRA, BGA, BBAC and other GA) preferring an RMZ over any other form of regulation, simply because a large number of them already have airband radios fitted, and it's a simple call up with no need for permissions or accepting directions, although I gather Southend are handing out the same.
So they will be very little help to us, as they have different objectives.
I can only assume that the TVHGC is acting on this one, with Tom Hardie, possibly the first step to show how many flights go through there, and to explain that they have not even considered us in their application.
Two extracts to ponder:
1.
Local Gliding Sites and Private Strips - Any glider sites and private strips within the proposed RMZ will require Letters of Agreement (LOAs) written to establish joint responsibilities and actions, but there is no intention to adversely affect their current operating practices.
2.
Non-Radio Aircraft - Although the airspace will be designated as an RMZ, non-radio-equipped aircraft will not be restricted from using it. However, operators of non-radio aircraft will be required to co-ordinate their flight with Oxford ATC via land line prior to getting airborne.
Hopefully the TVHGC will be holding Oxford to this promise and will get a LoA that will mean a maximum of one phone call a day to declare a site active and downwind flights to be on.
On 12/01/2015 12:52, Steve Purdie wrote:
So they will be very little help to us, as they have different objectives.
I can only assume that the TVHGC is acting on this one, with Tom Hardie, possibly the first step to show how many flights go through there, and to explain that they have not even considered us in their application.
Two extracts to ponder:
1.
Local Gliding Sites and Private Strips - Any glider sites and private strips within the proposed RMZ will require Letters of Agreement (LOAs) written to establish joint responsibilities and actions, but there is no intention to adversely affect their current operating practices.
2.
Non-Radio Aircraft - Although the airspace will be designated as an RMZ, non-radio-equipped aircraft will not be restricted from using it. However, operators of non-radio aircraft will be required to co-ordinate their flight with Oxford ATC via land line prior to getting airborne.
Hopefully the TVHGC will be holding Oxford to this promise and will get a LoA that will mean a maximum of one phone call a day to declare a site active and downwind flights to be on.
On 12/01/2015 12:52, Steve Purdie wrote:
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVHGC members list" group.
To post to this group, send email to TVHGC_Members@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to TVHGC_Members-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/TVHGC_Members?hl=en-GB
Please note that TVHGC may withdraw any posted messages deemed
unsuitable but does not generally endorse any posted content.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVHGC members list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tvhgc_members+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 | This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. |
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder